During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction

During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the priority of satisfying the claims of creditors secured by the pledge of the debtor’s property. What decision in this case can be made by the meeting of creditors and what does it depend on? What decision can be made by the arbitral tribunal? Can the SRO arbitration managers, of which the administrative manager is a member, influence these decisions?
There are 2 answers
Carol scott
Carol scott
Answered on April 12, 11:21
Earnings from 20 000 rubles a day! - Do you need a ready, already customized method of earnings? - Without difficult courses that you can not figure out. - Without routine work. - Without cheating and that the money was worthy. - It is a ready-made income, and not a useless course! Details on site 7529
A source:
Best
Carol scott
Carol scott
Answered on April 13 05:18
Earnings from 20 000 rubles a day! - Do you need a ready, already customized method of earnings? - Without difficult courses that you can not figure out. - Without routine work. - Without cheating and that the money was worthy.

Related news

During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction image, picture, imagery


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 51


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 55


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 41


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 34


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 68


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 69


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 16


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 11


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 66


During the financial recovery procedure, the administrative manager violated the order of satisfaction 35